Where is my Batman Game?: Huh? Edition


I, like the rest of the world, went and saw the new Batman movie last weekend. I really liked it, but I am not much of a gauge. I liked all of them. Even Batman and Robin (Akiva Goldsman explained it was not his fault, the director butchered his great script). Batman is my favorite super hero, because he is just a guy. Anyone can be Batman. All you have to do is work at it . . . . and be psychotic.

I started with the Neal Adams/ Dennis O'Neil comics when I was a kid, survived through the early 80's malaise to see Alan Moore's The Killing Joke and Frank Miller's Dark Knight breathe life into the character once again. I made it through the Knighfall period and even forgave the Azrael continuity interruption and break in film making until Jim Lee and Christopher Nolan reintroduced him in comics and film. My only reward on the gaming side is pain. Bad game, after bad game, after bad game. Some, thank you very much Acclaim 1.0, were not even finished when they shipped. Why can't I have a good Batman game?

We all know the issues surrounding licenses and games. There is not enough time to make between greenlight and release. There is no certainty of sequels, so there is a great risk the investment will have to be supported by a single game. License fees eat up the production budget. Blah, blah, blah. All of these are real concerns, but not here. Warner had three years from the last Batman movie to figure out what they were going to do in games, and the best they could do is Lego Batman. As a fan, I am kind of bummed out. If I were Warner and thinking about the money I left on the table, I would be more than that. They could have paid for the film with the game. Activision made one good Spiderman game and then sold millions with a marginal game based on the film Spiderman 3. Iron Man, not a darling of the critics, but great selling game. Here is a radical thought, how about a great Batman game for release against the next Batman film.

I am no expert, but I would be willing to bet even money there will be another Batman film. Warner is now in the business of making games, they could build it. The character is worth a significant investment. If they get started now, they will likely make the next film. If they don't make the next film, who really cares. It is still one of the best franchises in the world. Either way . . . can I please have my game?




Comments

Anonymous said…
The Konami ones were good. At least on the SNES are Genesis. And how could you forget the CLASSIC NES version of the Michael Keaton Batman movie.
July 22, 2008 at 9:12 AM
Karl Andersson said…
On the subject of licensed games and the associated pains, Swedish developers www.starbreeze.com did a very competent job (89 on metacritic) on the Chronicles of Riddick franchise. Interestingly this game was a prequel to - and released before - the actual movie (39 on metacritic).
July 28, 2008 at 3:32 AM
Unknown said…
You are right Karl. I am a fan of Starbreeze and the Riddick game was great. I played it all the way through. It stands, with a few other film based games, as an example that licensed games can be good.
July 28, 2008 at 6:15 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Media is Reporting the Game Industry is Over: Why are They Such Babies Edition

Image
My posting continues to move at a glacial pace. For a while, there was nothing new to say. Then, all of sudden, the world exploded with new ideas and I had no time to write. I attribute the plethora of new ideas - things other than marketing gaffes, publishers' hosing of developers, the need for independent finance and the folks who are saying they have it or xBox becoming cable - as a reflection of increased sensitivity attributable to too much travel and too little sleep. But bubbles are growing, companies are reacting, and CEOs seem to be turning into either Chicken Little or ostriches with heads in the sand. Some of the new stuff floating around in my head is: - The abandonment of seasoned game designers in favor of metric driven design - catering to metrics let you keep more players, but are those players worth keeping? - The complete lack of game sales data for XBL and PSN - Do the platforms really think they are helping us by cloaking sales in a shroud of mystery? - Th
Read more

The Game Business Is A Year From Irrelevance:Where are Our Easy Riders and Raging Bulls Edition

Image
Every time I told people in suits and ties - or my parents - I was in the game business, they started to talk about kids. They viewed our business as the toy business. Games are for children. This was when I pulled out my silver bullet. I had The ESA's (then IDSA) latest report showing the average age of gamers. I started when it was 27. The "average age" went up a year each year, but was still a neat statistic when I could say 30 or 31. Whether it was directed at a school parent or an audience at a conference, It inevitably led to a dropped jaw and a "wow, I didn't know that." The industry instantly became relevant to their business. I haven't really paid much attention to this number because my proselytizing for the business was taken over by outlets like the Wall Street Journal, Newsweek and USA Today, which all have a larger reach than this blog or my speaking engagements. But this past week I saw some slides for an ESA speech indicatin
Read more

The Timothy Plan: Hypocrisy Edition

Image
Every once in a while you come across an act of Hypocrisy so egregious, you have to laugh. I read an article on game politics about a mutual fund called The Timothy Plan , which call itself a family of mutual funds offering individuals a biblical choice when it comes to investing. If you are concerned with the moral issues (abortion, pörnography, anti-family entertainment, non-married lifestyles, alcohol, tobacco and gambling) that are destroying children and families you have come to the right place. The Timothy Plan® avoids investing in companies that are involved in practices contrary to Judeo-Christian principles. Our goal is to recapture traditional American values. We are America's first pro-life, pro-family, biblically-based mutual fund group. . The fund issued a press release indicating it would not invest Take Two Interactive because "it is releasing another video game that contains extreme sexual and violent content." Curiously, the release did not mention t
Read more